Wednesday, 2 May 2018

The best & worst of content management systems accessibility


Since February 2018, Tenon.io has been performing research 24/7/365 on accessibility and publish the raw numbers publicly on our site. The data gathering is ongoing but slow. We analyze logs (from customers who’ve given us permission) as well as crawling the web on our own. We take the logs and analyze the technologies in use on the page’s domain. The ultimate goal, at this point, is just to gather the data to determine whether any of it is useful. There are well over 1.3 billion websites on the Web and many thousands of different technologies in use. That alone means that there are tens – or even hundreds – of thousands of different possible combinations of technologies in use. When you add in the different versions of each technology that could be in use and the possible differences in configurations of those technologies, you’re certainly well into the millions of possible combinations. For this reason, we don’t know if this research will ever produce anything of value. Our slow rate of data gathering might impact this even further.
Nevertheless, we think it is worth it to try. Gathering the data itself is relatively cheap and involves no human
Source: https://managewp.org/articles/17381/the-best-worst-of-content-management-systems-accessibility



source https://williechiu40.wordpress.com/2018/05/02/the-best-worst-of-content-management-systems-accessibility/

No comments:

Post a Comment